An explosive this morning hit the United States embassy in the Greek capital Athens, with little damage but leaving a lot of question marks. Nobody go

THE MAN WHO HAS THE ANSWERS IS NOT TALKING by Henk Ruyssenaars - Foreign correspondent FPF - Europe - Jan. 12th 2007 - The Greek news agency published about the attack on the US embassy in Athens as follows: A strong blast was reported shortly before 6 a.m. (4 a.m. GMT) at the US embassy in central Athens, with Greek authorities now investigating inside the compound, according to the US ambassador." - Normally 'local authorities' are never allowed into any embassy area. A foreign embassy is 'extra-territorial'. What outside US embassy circles now is discussed is the question how anybody ever could come close enough to the US embassy at number 91 in the Vasilissis Sophias Avenue? Where for the past decades Greek special police, US Marines, guns, sniffer dogs and cameras have guarded the US embassy and the buildings around as some Fort Knox? Afraid of attacks by Greek and other people who for decades sincerely have disliked the US policy and what they have done to their country. Which with a CIA coup and the Greek 'colonels junta' was turned into a US colony and NATO base because it's strategically too very important for the US junta's quest for hegemony. But this 'terrorist attack' looks as suspicious as is possible, since only people connected or invited to the guarded US embassy can get anywhere close. No evidence - fake or real - has turned up yet. And it can't as usual be blamed on the 'November 17' (N-17) guerilla because the 'authorities' said they dismantled it.* But after forty years of US ruling still the Greek people keep saying - like most in the world - that Bush and Blair are the 'Butchers of Baghdad' and the US junta and it's war machine - including the UN plus NATO's troops and mercenaries - represent the real terrorists. Which is totally correct of course. The fact that US ambassador and Bush friend Ries immediately after the blast confirmed that the attack 'came from the outside' left the question unanswered how any person even could get close enough to throw a Molotov cocktail across the embassy's 3 meters (10 ft) high fences or carry around and shoot some kind of missile? "There is no justification for such an act of violence," Ries said and added that it was a "very serious" incident." Which may be used to further restrict what's left of civil liberties in this US colony with it's for freedom fighting people. [I've visited friends in Greece for decades. - HR] The US even was running secret jails of the American Gulag on military bases in Greece. - Url.: www.apfn.net/messageboard/ 01-06-06/discussion.cgi.72.html THE ANSWERS... It looks like the 'attack' on the US embassy as usual has been a 'false flag' operation by the US 'special ops forces' to divert global attention from the lost war in Iraq and the US junta's preparations to activate another 'false flag' operation to be able to start a nuclear war with Iran. ['False flag' - Google - http://tinyurl.com/ta9fl] - Never telling the people they brainwash that Iran is very much bigger in population and surface. And has bought arms for billions of oil money. And has been permanently controlled by the US via satellites too.* Now the Gulf is full of US warships and those of collaborating countries like Holland, waiting for the US orchestrated 'incident' to blind and brainwash people again. Like after the 9/11 'inside job', another US home made 'Pearl Harbor' as US commentator Roberts writes.* THE SILENT CIA MAN The man who has the answers and is not saying anything, is Thomas Countryman, at present the NSA/CIA liaison in Athens and as number 2 the 'policy officer' at the US embassy. Countryman learned most of his CIA tricks in the major CIA institute in the Arab world, situated in Tunisia in North Africa. As an independent foreign correspondent I had to know and knew also people at the US embassy, where I normally was invited during those years. And also of course by the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) with the by the Israeli Mossad poisoned Chairman Yasser Arafat and his doomed cooperators as well.* Thomas Countryman was in Tunis in 1990/'91 and studied for a year at the CIA 'spy school' in Sidi Bou Said. He often ate his lunches at a small restaurant called 'La Bagatelle', on the other side of the street. I lived in Sidi Bou Said and very often lunched in 'La Bagatelle' too, in this very picturesque village on the beaches of the Mediterranean. [Sidi Bou Said Pics - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/vdhe9] In his official bio at says "From 1988 to 1990, Mr. Countryman studied Arabic language and culture at the Department's Foreign Service Institute in Virginia for one year, followed by a year at the Institute's field school in Tunis." At the embassy in Athens his function is described as Deputy Chief of Mission. Meaning he is the man in charge of overall security. THE CIA TRAINING CENTER As one of the last foreign correspondents I was declared 'persona non grata' and forced to leave the country July 31st in 1996. - [http://tinyurl.com/rw6o3 ] - A week after I arrived on 7 November 1987, coup general and president Zine El Abedine Ben Ali, the present military ruler of Tunisia, with american help took the power from old and ailing president Habib Bourguiba. The country which is an american colony, had, and apparently still has, the biggest secret Middle East 'CIA Arabic training center' in coastal Sidi Bou Said, 17 kilometers from the capital Tunis. The 'school' is next door to the US ambassadors residence, and can be seen from the terrace during receptions. - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/585dc ] According to Countryman's cv: "He has been Deputy Chief of Mission at the United States Embassy in Athens, Greece since September 2005. During Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm, he served as the Political-Military Officer at the American Embassy in Cairo, Egypt. From 1991 to 1993, he was the senior officer for reporting on political, security, and religious affairs within Egypt. In 1993 and 1994, Mr. Countryman worked in the State Department's Office of Counter-Terrorism, where he helped to achieve passage of a UN Security Council resolution on bringing to justice the suspects in the bombing of Pan Am flight 103." THE BOMBING OF PAN AM FLIGHT 103 The last sentence again shows that Thomas Countryman is one of those fishy CIA characters. It didn't matter that Scotland Yard said that he and his CIA/FBI buddies falsified the evidence in the Lockerbie trial. A miscarriage of justice if there ever was one which was an eternal shame and mockery concerning human rights and justice. But Countryman 'helped' to bring the patsies to the Scottish kangoroo court. Url.: http://tinyurl.com/y6mujq Apart from the absolutely mad US junta's preparations for an attack on Iran - and if they still can, later on oil rich and close Venezuela - there are other protests they want to stop. Groups in Greece and the rest of Europe have to be silenced because they decided two weeks ago that coming 9th-11th February in Warsaw in Poland they'll hold an 'International Gathering To Prepare The Protests Against The G8-Summit 2007' to discuss the actions against the G-8 meeting in Rostock in Germany later this year. According to my point of view - working at a 15 minutes drive from the Dutch/German border - Germany and its policy under US stooge and PM Angela Merkel has become the murkil of the US junta in Europe. Again in November last year, Greek riot police fired tear gas to disperse demonstrators marching to the US embassy in Athens who chanted slogans including "Bush the butcher, out of Iraq" and "The USA is the real terrorist". And Washington's junta abhors their very appropriate slogan: "To those who wants to dominate the world, the world responds: RESISTANCE!" But, as with a lot of irony can be said, it's good to know that the investigation is in the hands of qualified people... Who are specially trained for these kind of 'terrorist attacks'. By the CIA... HENK RUYSSENAARS REFERENCES + LINKS: UNITED STATES AMBASSADOR TO GREECE CHARLES P. RIES - Url.: http://athens.usembassy.gov/about_us/ambassador.htm US DEPUTY CHIEF OF MISSION - THOMAS M. COUNTRYMAN - Url.: http://athens.usembassy.gov/about_us/dcm.htm DISTRACTING CONGRESS FROM THE REAL WAR PLAN - By Paul Craig Roberts - Url.: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16121.htm IRAN HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY CONTROLLED BY THE US - Url.: http://www.countercurrents.org/us-henk160805.htm LOCKERBIE : 2.7 BILLION $ SHAM AND SHAME - "This has been a political court case, where the verdict already was decided upon in advance" Prof. H. K?chler the UN observer said. - Url.: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4460.htm INTERNATIONAL GATHERING TO PREPARE THE PROTESTS AGAINST THE G8-SUMMIT 200 - Url.: http://dissentnetzwerk.org/node/129 ONE MORE IMPOSED FRIENDSHIP OF WAR - Picture Greek police guarding the National Assembly against the people - Url.: http://www.resistance2003.gr/en/news/story.php?id=97 NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE GREEK LANGUAGE IS NEEDED FOR THE PICTURES: GREEK POLICE IN ACTION - Url.: http://www.2007-g8.tk/ US AND NOVEMBER 17TH: ACCORDING TO THE CIA VIA THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS November 17, Revolutionary People’s Struggle (Greece, leftists) - Url.: http://www.cfr.org/publication/9275/#1 THE ISRAELI SECRET SERVICE MOSSAD POISONED PLO LEADER ARAFAT. - Url.: http://forpressfound.blogspot.com/2006/11/israel-poisoned-arafat.html WHERE'S THE OIL IN IRAN? IS IT REALLY BIGGER THAN IRAQ? - Url.: http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/iran_petroleum_facilities_2004.jpg * HR / ARAFAT: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS? - DOES THE 'ROAD MAP' LEAD TO 'ETERNAL PEACE' FOR THE PALESTINIANS ? - Url.: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4666.htm * The Dutch author this far has lived and worked abroad - never in an English speaking country - for more than 4 decades for international media as an independent foreign correspondent, of which 10 years - also during Gulf War I - in the Arab World and the Middle East. Seeing worldwide that every bullet and every bomb breeds more terrorism! Which also French President Jacques Chirac confirmed - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/ym44vm * FPF-COPYRIGHT NOTICE - In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107 - any copyrighted work in this message is distributed by the Foreign Press Foundation under fair use, without profit or payment, to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the information. Url.: http://liimirror.warwick.ac.uk/uscode/17/107.html FOREIGN PRESS FOUNDATION Editor: Henk Ruyssenaars http://tinyurl.com/gpr4j The Netherlands fpf@chello.nl -0- -0- -0- -0-

21th day of trial, Aachen, monday, september 5th 2005

- Begonia is advocated by a new lawyer

- Taking of evidence finished

- Summing up speeches of the prosecutor

- Demanded sentences: Jose-15 years, Gabriel-14 years, 9 months, Bart-7

years, Begonia-13 months on probation 

(all sentences without a chance for get out of jail earlier)

- Summing up speech of the 

Today the trial began as sharp as it never did before and 'cos the 

judge

didn't wait for all visitors to make it through the controls there was

no friendly and loud "Hello"

for the three this time.

There was more police present then usually and in the neigboring street

8 police cars instead one could be found.

Begonia had the chance to change the lawyer. Today lawyer Schaefer is

present as substitution and from next time on the lawyer of her choice

will there.

It is announced that the applications for partiality are rejected, same

for two applications to hear further witnesses about the situation at

Halifaxstreet.

Lawyer Poell makes a statement about the cleaning of the audience space

during the last day of trial. One person who left the court room right

before this happened was

banned to not enter the house anymore, too. After this statement

Gabriels lawyer made an application with reading a text Gabriel wrote.

This text deals with results of his 

imprisonment and the torture in spanish prisons.

Lawyer Franke makes an application to hear the officer who interviewed

the witness Sommer whose car was the second one used for escape. He

should confirm that Mr. 

Sommer testified when he escaped he lost any sense of what happened

around him. (This testimony refers to that part of Barts accusation

which accuses him to have been actively involved of the stealing of the

car).

Prosecutor Geimer does as usually demand to reject all applications, 

the

first one 'cos there is no relevance to the trial and the other one 

'cos

it it too late.

After the judges retreated for consultation both application are

dismissed.

After a debate about lawyer Poells statement on the cleaning of the

audience space it is applied to hear the person who was banned from

entering the house without

any reason. The lawyer of Jose and Begonia join that application. The

chamber rejects it 'cos of the missing relevance to the taking of

evidences.

The chamber wants to close the taking of evidences. Following that

lawyer Ruppert makes an application to interrupt the trial 'cos today 

he

can only be present till 12:00

and wants to be present when the accuser does his final speech.

Begonias substitute lawyer declares that today he doesn't want to do 

the

pleading today. Judge Nohl assures him of that. When Nohl asks Begonia

she says the lawyer

of her choice from cologne will do the final speech.

The application of lawyer Ruppert is dismissed with the hint he could

obtain all details from lawyer Poell and this is the reason why there

are lawyers present.

What follows are the final speeches

At first: Prosecutor Geimer.

(comment: We tried to reproduce the final speeches of the prosecutor 

and

the joint plaintiff with the words they used. That we could not quote

everything is 'cos

we had no chance to write down excatly every word they used.

It is a pain to hear how they use the suffering of Mr. and Mrs. Schulz

and discredit Gabriels letter. And it is such a poor act that

"anarchists" "help" a prosecutor 

with his final speech. It hurts us to reproduce this so relaxed 'cos 

all

of the statements one has to question. These are final speeches of

lawyers who are aiming

at the maximum penalty...)

Final speech of the prosector:

Before he begins with his speech he declares that something like this

never happened before in his 25 year longing career as advocate for the

interests of the state.

On the one hand the behavior of the defendants, their behavior in court

and the intention to do this trial as a political one. On the other 

hand

the audience whose 

behavior was unbearable and who did a report after every day of the

trial one could read online. He rejects the political motives

vehemently. Regarding this he reads

a text where he quotes anarchists who declare that taking hostages has

nothing in common with anarchism, that a free society works without

violence (force) and

the defendants from Aachen are nothing but criminals. He uses this as

proof the trial is not a political one. It is blind solidarity and no

excuse.

All statements of the defendants were read after the taking of 

evidences

was done already that is why the statements must be seen as

constructions.

Concerning the points of the accusation he sees all of them as 

approved.

Accusation of Jose and Begonia about the bank robbery in Karlsruhe:

To him Jose is the for sure the committer of the bank hold-up 'cos he

was in Karlsruhe at this time the surveillance camera material convicts

him. He can't say for

sure that Begonia was his complice but she helped him on logistical

aspects since she lives in Karlsruhe and speaks german.

The fact of handling of stolen goods he sees as proved 'cos she was on

welfare, but bought a car for her brother and payed some debts.

Accusation of collusion for heist:

Two maps were found, wigs and walky talkies what indicates that they

were planning robberies. Nevertheless there are not enough proofs for

sentence on that.

Complex 3 and 4 of the accusation (control situation and chase)

Federal Frontier Guards testified the accused Jose and Gabriel had 

faked

papers with them, but they didn't realize this when checking it. The

situation escalated when they

said Jose should open the backpack what resulted in Jose and Gabriel

pulling their guns at the same time - this indicates they had an

arrangement on this.

Joint plaintill Schulz leaves the court room crying.

Geimer declares this is a proof he is still suffering from what

happened.

The hostages were forced to get into the car, Jose was driving and

witness Schulz sat right next to him. Bart was sitting in the back of

the car and so hindered Mrs. Schulz

to leave the car what makes him a complice. During the mad drive Jose

drove to the center of the city and 'cos of his life-threatening way of

driving Mrs. Weiss was slightly

injured when the first accident occured.

Gabriel was leaning out of the window and aimed at the car of the

Federal Frontier Police behind them. This was life-threatening to the

officers just as to the passersby 'cos

of possible richocets. Another life-threatening situation occured when

Jose was driving right through a group a passersby without using the

brakes. Only the prompt reaction of the passersby prevented harm. 

During

the escape Gabriel short various times at the car of the Federal

Frontier Police and again it was luck nothing happened. Because it was

not possible to go on with this car they had to change it. Before they

left with this new car Gabriel went to the car of Federal Frontier

Police and shot three times. A proof for this are the bullet casings. 

At

this time Bart had the chance to leave, but he remained inside the new

car and helped convincing witness Sommer to get into the car. But Mr.

Sommer could escape and the accused persons went to a shop and did dig

themselves in.

Begonia was resisting her arrestment, so the arrestment was rather

difficult just as the skilled officers affirmed. During the trial she

attracted attention by her arrogant behavior.

The guilt of Bart during the change of the car used for escape can be

determined.

The attempted murder the prosecutor derives from the firing off several

shots by Gabriel in combination with the valuation of the officers. He

points out that even the officers were old hands to them the situation

was very dangerous.

The missing criminal liabilty or reduced criminal liabilty - there is 

no

hint on that, the experts did clearly point it out.

Moral valuation: "What can be interceded for the defendants? NOTHING."

Begonia wasn't involved in the further deeds, that must be considered.

"What opposes the defendants? Massive use of force, brutality,

criminality."

The defense and the supporters show clear traits of belittlement. Mr.

Schulz is a proof for the heaviness of what happened 'cos even after a

year he can't stand staying inside the court room. A political

motivation of Gabriel and Jose can't be detected.

Concluding he states the citizens and the police must be protected by

court and justice as well: Only an insistent penalty can assure this.

The society needs to react on such a behavior to show that no one will

get away unpunished. Officers must be able to feel save. Political

motivations are just pleaded.

He demands the following sentence:

Jose:

Complex 1 (bank hold-up Karlsruhe): 5 years; Complex 2 (collusion to a

crime): acquittal; Complex 3 and 4 (resisting authority, intervention 

of

road traffic, mayhem, attempted armed roberry, taking hostages,

attempting murder): 12 years; Complex 5 (armed robbery, attempted

murder): 8 years

Overall duration of sentence: 15 years, without a chance to get 

released

earlier.

Gabriel:

Complex 2: (collusion to a crime); acquittal; Complex 3 and 4 

(resisting

authority, intervention of road traffic, mayhem, attempted armed

roberry, taking hostages, attempting murder): 12 years; Complex 5 

(armed

robbery, attempted murder): 10 years

Overall duration of sentence: 14 years, 9 months, without the chance to

get released earlier

Bart:

Complex 2: (collusion to a crime): 1 year, Complex 3 and 4 (resisting

authority, intervention of road traffic, mayhem, attempted armed

robbery, taking hostages, attempted murder): 4 years; Complex 5 (armed

robbery, attempted murder): 6 years

Overall duration of sentence: 7 years, without a chance to get released

earlier

Begonia:

Complex 1 (bank hold-up Karlsruhe): 1year, Complex 6 (resisting

authority): fine of 1200 Euro, 10 Euro a day

Overall duration of sentence: 13 months on probation

The wigs, weapons and the alleged money from the bank hold-up should be

confiscated.

Lawyer Poell declares the judges did already dismiss the accusation for

attempted murder. If the prosecutor now

comes up with this again he knows two applications he could make that

confute this. The first one would be the 

hearing of an officer who testified he saw the muzzle flash that means

the gun was pointed right at him what is

technically not possible. And the other application would deal with the

testimony three bullet casings were found 

what is not true as well 'cos the revolver couldn`t carry enough 

bullets

for that.

Final speech of the joint plaintiff:

The lawyer of the joint plaintiff just made some additions to what the

prosecutor already said. He pointed out the

hostages were not released, they escaped, still with panic another shot

could follow. Mrs. Schulz can`t participate

in the trial anymore, she just can`t stand it. What happened in court 

is

no tolerable treating of the court. The 

therapeutical method to handle what happened via being present in the

court room during the room was no

success. The traumata increased. It got so bad the marriage is in 

danger

now.

The apology Gabriel made to the former hostages with his letter doesn`t

deserve the label apology. Every

approach for excuse is followed by a "if" or "but". Not a single time 

he

says: I want to apologize. The worst

thing is the sentence: "I took away 5 minutes of your freedom, for me

this means years." Even if it had been

only 5 minutes (it was a lot longer, by the way), he didn't want to be

be the defendants on a mad drive, the

gun pointed at him. Regarding Mr. Schulz leaving the court room crying

he states: "Here it is no woman

that run away, a young man, but a man."

The judge asks the defense to do the final speech. The defense asks for

a five minute break. After

the break they declare to do the final speech all together which is

better than doing it in parts and lawyer

Ruppert isn`t present anymore and for Begonia only the

substitute-lawyer.

When asked Begonia says she wants the lawyer of her choice, Schulz, to

do the final speech which

is okay to the judge and the hint is made that her trial can be

separated from the one of the others.

The final speeches of the defense will be done during the next day of

trial on september 21th, 2005.

15th day of trial in Aachen, 06.07.2005.

The 15. day of trial against Jose, Bart, Gabriel and Begonia began at

10:00. Gabriel was wearing his shorts only again 'cos nothing changed

regarding the security measures.

Judge Nohl indoctrinated the audience that it's not allowed to leave 

the

space for the audience to advance the accused persons. Because it

happened two times before, next time it will be punished with a fine.

During the 14. day of trial an expert opinion from spain was brought in

that was dealing with the gunshot wound Jose received in 1981 in a

conflict with a cop. That expert opinion had been translated in the

meantime and the evaluator Mrs. Mörth (psychologist) was ordered to

check Jose for post traumatic and bodily harm that could have any 

impact

on the deeds in june last year.

The expert opinion reported about the state Jose was brought in to the

surgical emergency room in Zaragoza on 28.03.1981 and which surgeries

had to be done.

Jose suffered from three gunshot wounds, one in the back, one below the

heart and one shot hit him at the far right part of his neck - that

bullet hurted the abdomen and came out of his body below the chin 

again.

Mrs. Mörth said the scars match up with wounds the opinion reports

about, so there's no reason to question it.

She spoke with Jose when "his" interpreter was present and did check

him, too. She described what is meant with a traumatic experience and

that Joses state can be described as that. But post traumatic disorders

she could neither find during the conversation with Jose nor in court.

She said that when Jose was speaking about the experiences with the

spanish police he was moved, but she can't see evidences of a post

traumata cos no disturbance of memory occured.

During the depiction of the firing in the trial Jose didn't behave

abnormal, he was speaking to has lawyer, ate and did even yawn. In

addition to that Jose had no manner of avoidance after the firing in

1981 what his lifestyle testified about. All things considered there 

are

no hints for a post traumatic disorder and bodily Jose is doing well,

too.

No questions where aimed at the evaluator whereupon another expert

opinion was read out which was done by the chief of the government

council Milles on 23.06.2004. It was dealing with the check for traces

of powder on the hands of Jose, Gabriel, Bart and Begonia. First it was

said that the amount of traces of powder is connected with the make of

the gun and that after only 30 minutes of desk work for instance only

half of the traces of powder are still traceable and after washing ones

hand nothing at all anymore.

Very few traces of powder could be traced at Gabriels and Joses right

hand and on Begonias left hand. That means it can't be said for sure

that this person fired a gun, but it can't be negated for sure, too. At

Barts hands nothing was found at all.

After the end of the day of trial a barrier of cops set up in front of

the audience so nobody could evade the indoctrination of the beginning.

But calls out to eachother where exchanged and that was good!

A short day in court, but still it was good to see the prisoners and

show them that they are not alone.

On friday, July, 08. at 15:00 it goes on in room 339 of the Aachener

Landgericht.